- Venice Takeaway
- Project Team
- In Context
- Venice Biennale
In Britain’s current architectural climate many practices consider the industry to be over-regulated. Architects argue that burdensome building standards stifle innovation and creativity, resulting in monotonous design. At the same time practitioners acknowledge a need for the state to take responsibility for the population’s health and safety. Architects Liam Ross and Tolulope Onabolu travelled to Lagos, Nigeria to reframe this debate and offer an alternative critique of regulation through an examination of risk, personal responsibility and sovereignty.
The exploration compares Edinburgh and Lagos – two quite different legislative structures – and reflects on the different ways they distribute risk and responsibility between the state and individual. Their research provides a critique of the inclusive and universalist rhetoric of British building regulations and suggests that the purpose of rules is actually to generate the possibility of exceptions.
Click on the tabs below to view more from Liam Ross and Tolulope Onabolu:
IN THEIR OWN WORDS
Why did you want to be part of Venice Takeaway?
We wanted to engage with the debate on regulation in British architecture, which unfortunately is at an impasse. On the one hand, most British architects consider architecture to be over-regulated, stifling creative freedom and leading to standardised and monotonous designs. On the other hand, they long for a risk-free creative practice, asserting that the government needs to take responsibility for the population’s health, safety and convenience – a recipe for disciplinary impotence. Our aim is to reframe the debate. We want to clarify that it is only through exposure to risk that we develop responsibility as architects, clients and building users. The problem with regulation is not the freedom it takes away, but rather the freedom that it grants; regulation frees us – architects, clients, building users – from the need to take responsibility for ourselves.
Where did your idea come from?
Our idea was shaped through two phases. The first took place during a workshop at the Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture in which students surveyed the city. Their drawings depicted the built environment as it responded to a particular ‘British standards’. These drawings clearly illustrated that much of contemporary architecture resembles the clauses of building regulations set in bricks and mortar. Secondly, we wanted to compare the highly formalised set of regulations in Edinburgh with a less regulated city. How would the same risks be managed, and what tactics would individuals adopt to manage that risk? We chose Lagos partly because it’s Tolu’s hometown, but also because it’s a former British settlement. We expected to discover imported or inherited ‘British standards’ to make comparisons.
Did you discover what you set out to find, or something different?
We had hoped to record the behaviour of individual Lagosians through film and photography but soon discovered that this was impossible. It is very difficult to shoot photographs or films in Lagos. There is hostility towards the photographing of personally invested property in Lagos – from the self, to the home, to places of employment or perceived national heritage. As a result, we decided to concentrate on differences in the regulatory apparatus and document the physical fabric of the city.
Lagos/Nigeria Travel Log
Liam Ross (Architect, Educator); Tolulope Onabolu (Architect, Educator)
Via Schipol, Amsterdam
DATES IN THE FIELD
13th to 19th April 2012
Out: KLM flight KL1278/058t
Return: KLM flight KL0588/1277
Travel in Lagos: Private Driver: Amadi Friday, British Council Lagos
Camera: Canon EOS 50D, Tripod
Nigerian Business Visa, single entry (Nigeria High Commission); International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis
British Council, Risk Assessment 2012; University of Edinburgh Fieldwork Risk Assessment
Boosters: Hepatitis A, Typhoid, Tetanus, Diphtheria, Polio
Vaccines: Yellow Fever, Meningitis
Medication: Malarone, DEET
Ministry of Physical Planning, Lagos State Secretariat Adedeny Coker; Consultants Arbico PLC ABFR & Co.; British Council Offices; Lagos Motor Boat Club; Tafawa Balewa Square; The Ikoyi Club; Photographic Survey of Permissible Setbacks, 33 locations, Ikoyi-Lagos Island
Tunji Odunlami, Director of Town Planning, Lagos State Government; Fred Coker, Architect, Adedenyi Coker Consultants Afolabi Aiyeola, Contractor, Arbico PLC Morenike Nedum, Lawyer, ABFR & co.; Ojoma Ochai, Assistant Director, British Council Lagos; Tolulope Ogunlesi, Arts Director, British Council Lagos; Phillip MacDonald, Partner, Oberlander Architects, Edinburgh
Arrested while taking photograph of Lagos State Police Headquarters; held on suspicion of terrorism; access to lawyers refused; statement provided; interviewed and released by Lagos State Police commissioner; confirmed that no law prohibits photography of building, but permission to take photograph could not be granted – material destroyed
Find out more:
Architectural Design and Regulation by Rob Imrie and Emma Street